US military using tragedy to justify increased warship deployment

The Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) denounces the US government for using the grave human tragedy wrought by the recent supertyphoon Yolanda (international name Haiyan) in order to justify its operations to further increase the presence of its military warships and armed troops in the Philippines.

“The US government is engaged in disaster interventionism, exploiting the supine state of the Philippines after it was struck by supertyphoon Yolanda, in order to justify its deployment of armed, nuclear-powered and interventionist military warships and armed troops in the Philippines,” said the CPP.

“The CPP and the Filipino people denounce the Aquino government for shamelessly welcoming the US military troops with open arms.”

Citing news reports, the CPP pointed out that the US has deployed to the Philippines no less than six warships including US flagship aircraft carrier USS George Washington, that has with it at least 80 jet fighters as well as war helicopters and 5,000 naval soldiers. It will be accompanied to the Philippines by the USS Antietam, USS Cowpens, USS Mustin, USS Lasses guided missile cruisers, and the USS Charles Drew supply ship. Meanwhile, the British government is also sending the HMS Daring warship and a Boeing C-17 military transport aircraft.

The CPP further pointed out that aside from the warships that are sailing from Hong Kong and elsewhere, US armed personnel and equipment were already prepositioned in Manila and other parts of the country, indicating the continuing presence of armed US troops in the national capital. There are also news reports indicating that the facilities of the Tacloban airport have been taken over by the US military. The US military has also taken advantage of the disaster in order to gain access to the Mactan airport and seaport which has long been a subject of negotiations for increased US rotational presence in the Philippines.

Over the past three years since declaring its “Asia pivot”, the US government has been increasing its “rotational presence” in various countries in the Asia-Pacific region resulting in the militarization of territorial disputes and diplomatic relations among countries in the region and in outright violation of the territorial sovereignty of the Philippines and other countries.

“The US government is militarizing disaster response in the Philippines, in much the same way that the US militarized disaster response in Haiti in the 2010 earthquake,” said the CPP. The high-handed presence of US armed troops in Haiti has been widely renounced. The US government has since maintained its presence in Haiti.

“The Filipino people seek and welcome international support in the face of the terrible devastation brought about by Yolanda in a wide corridor across the Philippine islands,” said the CPP. “However, though devastated, the Filipino people has preserved their sense of national dignity and will continue to defend their sovereignty against foreign military interventionism.”

“What the disaster victims need urgently are food, water and medical attention, not US warships bringing in emergency rations to justifty their armed presence in Philippine sovereign waters,” pointed out the CPP. “If the US government were really interested in providing assistance to countries who have suffered from calamities, then it should increase its funds to civilian agencies that deal in disaster response and emergency relief, not in fattening its international military forces and taking advantage of the people’s miseries to justify their presence,” added the CPP.

Source: Systemic

Prole Center Addendum: I don’t want to go too far out on a limb here, but could we take this one step further and imagine that the U.S. military could have caused or at least increased the likelihood of this terrible event? As the links below will demonstrate, along with the excerpt from the 1977 UN Convention prohibiting weather modification for military purposes, this is nothing new and scientists have admitted the possibility of altering or steering hurricanes. Is it a coincidence, or a clever pretext, to use this disaster to increase military intervention to “stabilize” the Aquino regime under threat from a persistent popular resistance represented in no small part by the CPP and the New People’s Army?

My theory is that the technology exists, or is being developed, to nudge hurricanes in one direction or another and increase the probability, not certainty, of hitting a desired “target.” This line of reasoning could also hold true for a technology for causing or exacerbating other “natural” disasters like earthquakes and tsunamis. Just a theory; something to think about.  Take a look at the following:


TITLE: 26.1. Convention on the prohibition of military or any
other hostile use of environmental modification technique
New York, 10 December 1976.

. . . Recognizing that scientific and technical advances may open new possibilities
with respect to modification of the environment . . .

Article I
1. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military
or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having
widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or
injury to any other State Party.
2. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to assist, encourage
or induce any State, group of States or international organization to engage in
activities contrary to the provisions of paragraph 1 of this article.
Article II
As used in article I, the term “environmental modification techniques”
refers to any technique for changing – through the deliberate manipulation of
natural processes – the dynamics, composition or structure of the earth, including
its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere, or of outer space.

This entry was posted in Class War Chronicle and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to US military using tragedy to justify increased warship deployment

  1. beetleypete says:

    First I had heard of the technology to affect weather being so advanced, so it made a fascinating read.
    Regards from England, Pete.

  2. Prole Center says:

    When you read the scientific literature about this they will talk about how to slow down the hurricane and divert its course from high-population areas, but all you have to do is ask yourself, could there be a military application to this technology? and then you can rest assured that the ruling class asked this question from the very beginning and that is the primary purpose of the research. If they can possibly weaken a hurricane, can they also strengthen it? I think it just might be possible.

  3. beetleypete says:

    I have been around long enough to believe that most things that are possible, will eventually be corrupted into an application to be used in the pursuit of power and influence. Pity it cannot be proved at the moment!
    Regards as always, Pete.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s